Now citizens are weighing in expressing their anger over these massive budget cuts, and the same Republicans are sending letters saying “don’t blame me, I didn’t vote for the cuts.” A recent letter to constituents from State Senator Tony Strickland is most likely a standardized “boilerplate” budget statement that has been provided to Republicans to send out. Let’s see if we can translate it into English:
As your Senator, I voted against the budget and the education cuts included in the proposal. To answer your questions, I would like to share my reasons for opposing the budget and education cuts as well as why the Legislature decreased spending on K-14 education.
Translation: don’t blame me for budget cuts, I voted against them. I voted against everything you don’t like, and will claim to support everything you did like. Whatever it was. I can do that because I didn’t vote for anything.
In order to ease the impact of the funding decreases, the budget has granted local educational agencies unprecedented funding flexibility, which is the authority to move state funding for most categorical (special-purpose, such as principal training, English learner programs, and the arts) programs to supporting the highest locally-determined priorities through 2010-2011. The spending flexibility should provide local agencies significant relief during this economic downturn. However, if the agencies abuse the funding, then they have missed the opportunity to demonstrate that local communities are superior to managing their education funds than the bureaucrats in Sacramento.
Sorry, I can’t figure out what this means. Leave a comment if you can figure out what it says.
I will continue to support protecting education and providing local communities the flexibility to determine how to invest in their children. Please be assured I will continue to oppose cuts to education because the state’s greatest asset – our children – will be the future workforce essential in reviving our economy. Thank you, again, for contacting my office and sharing your concerns. It is citizens like you who make the difference.
Translation: While voting against every budget, and being against any form of revenues — especially if they would be collected from the large corporations that funded my campaign — I now claim to support not cutting the education budget.
This is an interesting strategy: Just vote against everything, and leave it to the responsible people to come up with ways to get around this obstruction. And then, when citizens are angry about the huge mess this creates, send them letters saying you supported whatever spending they wanted, and that’s why you voted against everything. Meanwhile, you collect your state paycheck, and receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in corporate “contributions.” Nice work, if you can get it.
This is a dilemma for responsible legislators. When you face an extremist group with just enough votes to block everything, how can you keep the kids in schools, provide oxygen tanks and other necessities to the elderly, provide police and fire protection and continue other essential government services? When the state’s major media just won’t inform the public of the facts and makes this budget standoff seem as though government is little more than children squabbling over some cookies, with “both sides” refusing to compromise, the state slides toward becoming ungovernable.
What you you do about this? There will be a ballot initiative tp roll back the rule that any revenue increases require a 2/3 majority to pass. This initiative is currently named Restore Majority Rule, and you can visit the early website at ca.restoremajorityrule.com. Please sign up to help pass this initiative, and tell your legislators, friends and family that you support this change.
I totally agree with you about the non-vote. It’s about the most cowardly thing you can do as a politician.
Well there we go! Agreement!